--- description: Ant Media Server : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur Ant Media Server, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Ant Media Server Tarif, abonnement, avis | GetApp Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion vidéo](/directory/590/online-video-platform/software) > [Ant Media Server](/software/2063396/ant-media-server) # Ant Media Server Canonical: https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2063396/ant-media-server Page : 1/8\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2063396/ant-media-server?page=2) > Ant Media Server est une solution de diffusion vidéo en temps réel hautement évolutive, configurée pour les besoins de diffusion vidéo en direct, qui permet la lecture et l'enregistrement sur site ou sur des réseaux publics dans le cloud tels que AWS, Azure et Alibaba Cloud. Elle est conçue pour permettre aux clients de déployer rapidement des solutions de diffusion vidéo en direct sans avoir à se préoccuper de leur fonctionnement en interne. > > Conclusion : 159 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.8/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.8/5** | 159 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: Ant Media - **Pays**: Ankara, Turquie - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2016 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 109,00 $ US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Travailleur autonome, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Linux (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Argentine, Australie, Bolivie, Brésil, Canada, Chili, Colombie, France, Guyana, Guyane française, Inde, Irlande, Italie, Mexique, Nouvelle-Zélande, Paraguay, Pays-Bas, Philippines et 10 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - API - Accès mobile - Chat en temps réel - Clavardage et messagerie - Conférences - Conférences vidéo - Contenu interactif - Diffusion continue de présentation - Diffusion continue en direct - Diffusion en temps réel - Diffusion sur médias sociaux - Distribution multicanal - Enregistrement d'appel vidéo - Enregistrement de l'écran - Enregistrement de session - Enregistrement des appels - Enregistrement à la demande - Enregistrements - Fichiers audio et vidéo bidirectionnels - Fichiers audio et vidéo bidirectionnels ## Intégrations (21 au total) - AWS CloudFormation - Amazon S3 - Android 11 - Azure Blob Storage - CentOS Linux - FFmpeg - Kubernetes - Linode - MongoDB - NGINX - NVIDIA GPU Cloud (NGC) - OAuth - Okta - Private GPU Cloud - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ... et 6 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/courriel - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion vidéo](https://fr.getapp.ca/directory/590/online-video-platform/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de gestion vidéo](https://fr.getapp.ca/directory/590/online-video-platform/software) - [Applications de visioconférence](https://fr.getapp.ca/directory/528/video-conferencing/software) - [Plateformes de streaming](https://fr.getapp.ca/directory/1715/live-streaming/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Zoom Workplace](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/111633/zoom-video-conferencing) — 4.6/5 (14688 reviews) 2. [Ecamm Live](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/131991/ecamm-live) — 4.8/5 (174 reviews) 3. [Castr](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2050571/castr) — 4.7/5 (446 reviews) 4. [Dacast](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/91510/dacast-web-conferencing) — 4.3/5 (230 reviews) 5. [Riverside](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2064508/riverside) — 4.8/5 (309 reviews) ## Avis ### "Reliable and Scalable Low-Latency Streaming Solution" — 4.0/5 > **Rashmi** | *29 mai 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ant Media Server is very easy to set up and use, even for teams without deep streaming expertise. The low-latency streaming performance is impressive, especially for real-time applications like live broadcasting and WebRTC streaming. I also liked the flexibility of deployment options and the support for adaptive bitrate streaming. The dashboard is clean, and content management is straightforward. Security features and API integrations make it suitable for scalable enterprise applications as well. > > **Inconvénients**: Some advanced configurations have a learning curve for first-time users, especially when dealing with custom integrations and server optimization. Documentation for certain edge cases could be more detailed. In high-scale deployments, monitoring and debugging tools could be improved further to simplify troubleshooting. > > Overall, my experience with Ant Media Server has been very positive. It provides reliable low-latency streaming performance and supports a wide range of real-time video applications. The platform is user-friendly, scalable, and offers useful features for enterprise deployments. Integration APIs and security options are strong, making it suitable for both startups and large-scale solutions. While some advanced configurations require technical understanding, the overall performance, stability, and flexibility make it a strong streaming platform. ----- ### "Happy Customer\!" — 5.0/5 > **Mark** | *23 février 2026* | Divertissement | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The Antmedia Server enterprise edition works really well with our flagship application, Miricam, which is a pay per minute videochat system the online entertainment industry. Antmedia Server is a perfect fit for it. > > **Inconvénients**: There are almost too many configuration options. Almost\! I think it could do well with a setup wizard. The basic configuration page isn't quite enough. > > It is pretty easy to install \& use. It requires a beefy server with lots of CPU Cores and RAM, and one nice thing it does it take advantage of any GPU's your server may have for transcoding. ----- ### "Satisfaction globale d'Ant Media" — 4.0/5 > **Yusuf** | *15 février 2025* | Rédaction et correction | Taux de recommandation : 1.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Le serveur multimédia Ant est idéal pour la diffusion en direct en temps réel. Serveur facile à mettre à l'échelle. Toutes les plateformes prennent en charge l'API REST et sont faciles à déployer. > > **Inconvénients**: La sécurité des flux du serveur multimédia Ant n'est pas très utile dans la documentation. Des informations plus récentes sont nécessaires concernant la sécurité des flux, comme la liste blanche des adresses IP et des domaines directement sur le serveur. Le problème principal est la sécurité des flux. Il existe de nombreuses boucles. > > Dans l'ensemble, c'est bien, nous serons des utilisateurs fidèles d'Ant Media depuis deux ans, le support était bon. ----- ### "Easy to Use and Powerful" — 4.0/5 > **Tristen** | *5 juin 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The things i loved most about Ant Media Server was how easy it was to get up and running. When it came to getting the inputs added in it was very intuitive as the UI was nice and simplistic without being to complicated to use or understand. I do appreciate all the video protocols this software supports when it comes to the inputs as well. > > **Inconvénients**: The only complaint i do have using this software really comes down to when im running it on a virtual server. It has abit of a hard time viewing the proper system resource usage prompting me to change the threshold to a higher trigger point in the configuration file in order to add or stream inputs > > My overall experience with Ant Media Server was largely positive. Getting it up and running was surprisingly easy, and the interface made the whole process feel intuitive. Adding inputs was straightforward thanks to a clean, simple UI that didn’t overwhelm me with unnecessary complexity. I also appreciated how many different video protocols it supports, which made it flexible for whatever sources I needed to bring in. The only real issue I ran into came when running it inside a virtual server. Ant Media Server had trouble accurately reading the system’s resource usage, which caused it to think the server was under heavier load than it actually was. Because of that, I had to manually raise the threshold values in the configuration file just to add or stream inputs. It wasn’t a major deal, but it was noticeable compared to how smooth everything else was. Overall, it was easy to use, powerful in terms of protocol support, and generally well‑designed with the one caveat that virtualization requires some manual tuning to get things running properly. ----- ### "Perfect for a Student Streaming Project, but Not a Walk in the Park" — 5.0/5 > **Rachit** | *10 juin 2026* | Enseignement supérieur | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: But what sets OBS apart from others is its ultra-low latency WebRTC streaming. While conducting my project of streaming our campus event broadcasts, we noticed the near-zero delay in streaming, which made a huge difference, allowing viewers to interact in real time. Another aspect worth mentioning regarding video streaming was the high-quality streaming, which worked fine at 1080p on our outdated lab server. On the other hand, I should point out the fact that the entire Security aspect remains under our complete control since hosting the server on our university internal network allowed us to guarantee the security of our faculty requirements. All features provided by OBS Community Edition are impressive: WebRTC, RTMP, HLS, REST API, and Scribe plugin. As an experiment, I tried using AI-powered automatic subtitles; they do work if audio is decent. The installation script helped me launch the core functionality in no time, while proper configuration will give one a full feeling of being in control. > > **Inconvénients**: Ease of Use, however, is where the trouble starts. The web management console resembles something from a dashboard of a machine designed by an engineer back in 2010 — everything works, yet it feels very much dated. Learning Curve was quite steep since I had to learn about the intricacies of working with streaming technologies and understand how exactly apps, streams, and nodes interact with each other. Content Management system can hardly be called so; one would have access only to raw information about currently active streams. There is no feature for searching and archiving previous broadcasts, which made the process of conducting tests somewhat complicated. For Video Content creation such as scheduling broadcasts or even creating a basic VOD library, extra scripting or additional tools will have to be used. Our use of mobile SDK resulted in black-screen errors with React Native, thus, web-based viewers had to be used instead. Lastly, although the core server itself is pretty safe, the access control and authentication are poorly documented. > > This was my very first experience with using a real-time streaming engine and although at first I found it quite challenging, the end result was definitely worth it. It only took me less than an hour to set up the server on Ubuntu, but tuning the streaming settings became a challenge – this is when the Learning Curve kicked in. However, after everything came together, I was impressed with how good the Video performance was and the extra Security provided by self-hosting added to the authenticity of our project. The Features of WebRTC support, RTMP ingestion, and REST API helped us create a basic dashboard to control our event stream. Lack of Content Management functionality, however, required us to manage our recordings directly from the file system. Although having AI subtitling plugin was a good plus, it wasn't ready yet to be used in production. All in all, I think that Ant Media Server can be a great platform for engineering students to learn about live video streaming protocols. ----- Page : 1/8\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2063396/ant-media-server?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2063396/ant-media-server) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées