--- description: RIB SpecLink : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur RIB SpecLink, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: RIB SpecLink Tarif, abonnement, avis | GetApp Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels d'architecture](/directory/529/architecture/software) > [RIB SpecLink](/software/2052440/speclink-1) # RIB SpecLink Canonical: https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2052440/speclink-1 Page : 1/6\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2052440/speclink-1?page=2) > SpecLink est un logiciel de gestion des cahiers des charges basé sur le cloud, conçu pour aider les entreprises à améliorer la coordination des cahiers des charges, à accélérer les tâches d’édition, à simplifier la certification en matière de conception durable et à synchroniser les cahiers des charges avec différents modèles BIM (Building Information Modeling). Le logiciel de gestion des cahiers des charges permet aux équipes d’identifier et d’ajuster les cahiers des charges en fonction des modifications apportées à leurs modèles Revit, de contrôler les incidences des modifications et de coordonner et de communiquer les principales modifications apportées à la conception. > > Conclusion : 117 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 117 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: RIB Software - **Fondé**: 1961 ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Travailleur autonome, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne, Arabie saoudite, Bahamas, Bermudes, Canada, Chine, Chypre, Costa Rica, Danemark, Espagne, Estonie, Finlande, France, Grèce, Géorgie, Hongrie, Inde, Irlande, Islande, Italie et 16 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Gestion de projets - Gestion des documents - Gestion des modèles - Imagerie 3D - Importation et exportation de données - Modèles personnalisables - Modélisation BIM - Nomenclatures - Planification - Pour architecture, ingénierie et construction - Projets multiples - Rapports personnalisables - Real-Time Notifications - Stockage de documents - Third-Party Integrations - Worfkflow de projets ## Ressources d'aide - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels d'architecture](https://fr.getapp.ca/directory/529/architecture/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels d'architecture](https://fr.getapp.ca/directory/529/architecture/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de chantier](https://fr.getapp.ca/directory/28/construction-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Design Flex](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2048910/2020-design-live) — 4.3/5 (354 reviews) 2. [AutoCAD](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/112399/autocad) — 4.7/5 (3205 reviews) 3. [Revit](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/120355/revit) — 4.6/5 (479 reviews) 4. [Programa](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2062141/programa) — 4.8/5 (73 reviews) 5. [ARCHICAD](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/113551/archicad) — 4.4/5 (279 reviews) ## Avis ### "Mechanical Engineer" — 5.0/5 > **Carlo** | *1 avril 2026* | Design | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Everything especially the cloud product supporting multi‑user workflows, comment-only access, and linking between specs and Revit models for coordination. Good for distributed teams > > **Inconvénients**: Subscription pricing, per‑seat and module fees can be expensive for small practices. Improving the cost would make it more affordable to more people ----- ### "SpecLink for a sole practitioner" — 5.0/5 > **Ivy** | *24 juin 2025* | Urbanisme et architecture | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It is easy to get up and running on SpecLink. The interface is fast, and editing is efficient. Content is updated regularly, and the updates can easily be applied to projects in process. It is not hard to edit their masters to create your own master. Thier content is not the same as the MasterSpec licensed from AIA, and it is less verbose. In most cases I have found that it covers the same content more efficiently. > > **Inconvénients**: It would be nice to have the option to license the AIA MasterSpec content and use the RIB interface, but it's not practical at this time. Importing outside master sections into SpecLink is challenging. Each section needs to be tagged and labeled just so, and it's necessary to carefully check the imported section to make sure that choices and content are showing up as intended. They are working on making the process better, but it is still challenging. Importing consultant sections for printing a project manual is also challenging, so I use a different product to assemble project manuals. As a cloud-based system, there is little capability to edit specs when offline. There is a lot of as-yet-untapped potential in this product to better leverage the tagging and crosslinking capabilities. For instance, specifying sustainability requirements, coordinating sections that are cross-referenced, and marking sections with a percentage of completion. I hope to see them develop these capabilities soon. > > Overall, implementing SpecLink has been a timesaver. It is easy to use, powerful, and works better than its competition. Their customer service is very good, and they are very helpful with onboarding. They listen to their users, and they are actively updating and improving the platform. ----- ### "Laura's Review" — 3.0/5 > **Laura** | *24 juin 2025* | Génie mécanique ou industriel | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It's great to have the ability to bulk format and keep master specs; linking throughout and overall speediness as compared to Speclink-E is a big improvement. > > **Inconvénients**: The header/footer function is a big downgrade from how it was in Speclink-E. Lately there are bugs with the software missing edits, missing choices, causing errors and typos that are not user-error. Tables are also a downgrade from Speclink-E. No ability to bulk print all-text drafts. > > Overall it's good, but every now and then it really lags and I'm constantly needing to refresh the page to try to get it to speed up. As mentioned above, the formatting abilities could really use work to bring it back up to Speclink-E quality and customization. Obviously, Speclink is much better than Word documents or otherwise, but it still causes headaches. ----- ### "Great spec writing tool" — 4.0/5 > **Russell** | *1 avril 2026* | Urbanisme et architecture | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The ability to edit with customized prompts and recommendations highlighted making it easy to skip over unneeded paragraphs. It's easy to use and increase my speed and accuracy in spec writing. > > **Inconvénients**: The program seems to lag in making paragraph selections, especially as you select paragraphs rapidly without stopping to make edits. > > It's been a great experience, especially knowing that the specification will be up to date with the most current information. ----- ### "Quality specification software" — 5.0/5 > **Chad** | *24 juin 2025* | Urbanisme et architecture | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ease of use, quality of content, and simplified presentation. I fall into the less-is-more method of specifications, and Speclink content has most of the stuff I need, without throwing a lot of additional nonsense at it. > > **Inconvénients**: The formatting is slightly limited, particularly for exporting numbered-line style specs in lieu of Masterformat specs. It's not a deal breaker, and can be worked around, though > > I have found the support to be excellent. If I have an issue, they are highly responsive and always resolve it quickly. They listen to customers to set priorities for future development as well. In the 3 years I've been on the system, I have seen impressive improvements in functionality, much of it customer driven ----- Page : 1/6\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2052440/speclink-1?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2052440/speclink-1) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | ----- ## Données structurées