--- description: RIB SpecLink : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur RIB SpecLink, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: RIB SpecLink Tarif, abonnement, avis | GetApp Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels d'architecture](/directory/529/architecture/software) > [RIB SpecLink](/software/2052440/speclink-1) # RIB SpecLink Canonical: https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2052440/speclink-1 Page : 1/6\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2052440/speclink-1?page=2) > SpecLink est un logiciel de gestion des cahiers des charges basé sur le cloud, conçu pour aider les entreprises à améliorer la coordination des cahiers des charges, à accélérer les tâches d’édition, à simplifier la certification en matière de conception durable et à synchroniser les cahiers des charges avec différents modèles BIM (Building Information Modeling). Le logiciel de gestion des cahiers des charges permet aux équipes d’identifier et d’ajuster les cahiers des charges en fonction des modifications apportées à leurs modèles Revit, de contrôler les incidences des modifications et de coordonner et de communiquer les principales modifications apportées à la conception. > > Conclusion : 118 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 118 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: RIB Software - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1961 ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Travailleur autonome, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne, Arabie saoudite, Bahamas, Bermudes, Canada, Chine, Chypre, Costa Rica, Danemark, Espagne, Estonie, Finlande, France, Grèce, Géorgie, Hongrie, Inde, Irlande, Islande, Italie et 16 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Gestion de projets - Gestion des documents - Gestion des modèles - Imagerie 3D - Importation et exportation de données - Modèles personnalisables - Modélisation BIM - Nomenclatures - Planification - Pour architecture, ingénierie et construction - Projets multiples - Rapports personnalisables - Real-Time Notifications - Stockage de documents - Third-Party Integrations - Worfkflow de projets ## Ressources d'aide - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels d'architecture](https://fr.getapp.ca/directory/529/architecture/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels d'architecture](https://fr.getapp.ca/directory/529/architecture/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de chantier](https://fr.getapp.ca/directory/28/construction-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Design Flex](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2048910/2020-design-live) — 4.3/5 (357 reviews) 2. [AutoCAD](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/112399/autocad) — 4.7/5 (3211 reviews) 3. [Programa](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2062141/programa) — 4.8/5 (73 reviews) 4. [Revit](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/120355/revit) — 4.6/5 (483 reviews) 5. [ARCHICAD](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/113551/archicad) — 4.4/5 (279 reviews) ## Avis ### "Longtime loyal subscriber" — 5.0/5 > **Jill** | *1 avril 2026* | Urbanisme et architecture | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I have been using Speclink for the past 10 years and find it easy to use and easy to modify to meet my company's needs. I appreciate the appropriately restrained level of detail in the content making it more user-friendly, the linking between parts and sections which reduces conflicts and ensures a higher level of coordination throughout our documents and formatting and printing features which greatly reduce time. It truly makes the documentation process more efficient, which allows us to spend our time on the things that matter - sharing our knowledge and contributing to a project's success. > > **Inconvénients**: I wish I could search the whole database for a specific product I've used before, that isn't in my master, but I want to find again. I also wish I could export directly into my project folder, rather than a download folder. > > I've really enjoyed using Speclink and highly recommend it. As an independent specifier, I've been asked to work in other programs from time to time based on a client's preferences, and those have only made me appreciate Speclink more. I also like that RIB will listen to feedback and are constantly working to make the program better. ----- ### "Easiest way to write specs." — 5.0/5 > **aaron** | *2 avril 2026* | Urbanisme et architecture | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Really easy to use overall. The built-in references and content are super helpful, and it’s quick to put sections together without much effort. It also makes it easier to coordinate across different disciplines, which is a big plus. The included products and manufacturers are great too—even if they don’t always fit every project perfectly, they’re a solid starting point and definitely better than starting from scratch. > > **Inconvénients**: Glitches with table of contents section; Content is somewhat limited for specialty systems/products. > > Fantastic. The platform has helped improve my spec writing and coordination. The master features are excellent tools. ----- ### "Laura's Review" — 3.0/5 > **Laura** | *24 juin 2025* | Génie mécanique ou industriel | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It's great to have the ability to bulk format and keep master specs; linking throughout and overall speediness as compared to Speclink-E is a big improvement. > > **Inconvénients**: The header/footer function is a big downgrade from how it was in Speclink-E. Lately there are bugs with the software missing edits, missing choices, causing errors and typos that are not user-error. Tables are also a downgrade from Speclink-E. No ability to bulk print all-text drafts. > > Overall it's good, but every now and then it really lags and I'm constantly needing to refresh the page to try to get it to speed up. As mentioned above, the formatting abilities could really use work to bring it back up to Speclink-E quality and customization. Obviously, Speclink is much better than Word documents or otherwise, but it still causes headaches. ----- ### "Nice spec writing software" — 4.0/5 > **Lan** | *1 avril 2026* | Urbanisme et architecture | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Complete specification sections and relatively easy to use, if you know the materials being used. I'd say not for someone that doesn't know the products. > > **Inconvénients**: Inconsistency between sections, such as spelling, grammar, and formatting. Weirdness as never printing the end of section Odd Page for the last section in a project print. Allowing the manufacturer to put their name in the section title. Big issue with that. Issue with updates not finishing, shows multiple pending but unable to complete. The updates can be extremely tedious for existing Office Templates. You have to transfer any changes to a new file or view each line item change to make sure it doesn't write over something included in the Template section. > > Good specification program, could be better. Haven't tried the Revit coordination yet. That could be a game changer. ----- ### "Breckenridge Group Architects" — 4.0/5 > **Richard** | *1 avril 2026* | Urbanisme et architecture | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I like the ability to review questions and options, comparing them against a defined direction, as well as the links to manufacturers' information, when necessary. > > **Inconvénients**: Moving back and forth between sections can be tedious - it's not possible to leave one section open to compare something against another section without the first one closing. > > Not having used a similar product before, it took a while to learn the nuances. Accessing the 'help' videos and notes has been extremely valuable and when issues arose that couldn't be resolved easily the support staff has been very accommodating and timely. ----- Page : 1/6\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2052440/speclink-1?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://fr.getapp.ca/software/2052440/speclink-1) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | ----- ## Données structurées